Lohan site
Lohan site

LINDSAY LOHAN AS TALENTED AS PROP 8 IS CONSTITUTIONAL!! Video

Check out today's SourceFed!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWIosqbTnzc&list=PL8F30E917C5D2E4D4

FACEBOOK: http://on.fb.me/mqpRW7 TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PhillyD

Philly D OFFICIAL APP: http://bit.ly/aIyY0w

----------------------------
ALL of today's Stories:
Motorcycle Circus Crash:
http://gizmo.do/wtFsMD

Lilyhammer Netflix Launch:
http://gaw.kr/yIhQQb

Machete Sequel??
http://bit.ly/x8GcAC

New Spiderman Trailer:
http://chzb.gr/zL5dwi

Best. Bet. Ever:
http://bit.ly/wuK5Pf

Lindsay Lohan Photos:
http://gaw.kr/xAWWoc

Jessica Nigri's Skyrim:
http://bit.ly/y7ZzKG

Cop Chase. For no reason.
http://bit.ly/w8GYXS

Prop 8 "Unconstitutional"
http://huff.to/wW9qXc
----------------------------

music by:
Ronald Jenkees: http://bit.ly/mQsz3h
@hagemeister
@urbandelights

Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Yahoo Buzz Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Stumble on StumbleUpon Add to Reddit Add to Google Bookmarks Add to Newsvine Add to MySpace Add to Windows Live Add to Furl Add to Fark Add to Facebook Submit to Digg Add to Delicious Add to Blinklist

Comments on "LINDSAY LOHAN AS TALENTED AS PROP 8 IS CONSTITUTIONAL!!"

What the f**k do I ...
What the f**k do I care if a gay? person gets married?

skyrim sexy? ftw!
skyrim sexy? ftw!

My problem is not ...
My problem is not with the constitutionality of a law it is that the people said no but the goverment doesn't respect the will of the people. If the law the law is over turned by the people later than so be it, the government needs to keep their nose out of things that don't? pertain to them

philip ue a slut ...
philip ue a slut but we love u for it <3?

In the beginning ...
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God - All the Glory to JESUS CHRIST. May God? bless you all !

worlds too small ...
worlds too small for wasting time being? prejudice against homosexuals

@himymovie mhm, so ...
@himymovie mhm, so you are a supporter of sexual discrimination. Because that's? what it sounds like.

@OFswag wrong ...
@OFswag wrong religion bud?

I respect your ...
I respect your opinion, and especially respect you respectfully offering yours. Its nice to have an encounter with someone who doesn't have? to resort to mediocre insults to get their point across, and I have to assume your opinion is based off of personal experience, just as mine is. I live in Washington state, so we're happy enough up here.

@brisadiva9 If god ...
@brisadiva9 If god didn't like or want gays, why would he? make them that way?

Being a Christian, ...
Being a Christian, I don't and probably will never support gay rights. However in saying that (and this is the part no one ever lets me finish before accusing me of being a homophobe) I was taught to love everyone, which is the Christian way. Therefore, calling gay people out of their names or degrading terms is not Christian like in? the slightest. And I will not lie, I used to dislike gay people because I thought I was supposed to, but then I realized that it was terribly wrong to do so.

@ ...
@icouldntmakeupaname2 Same examples? No I haven't. And really? You're resorting to ad hominems? Either way my previous? comment was just showing you that stupid superstious unfounded beliefs that you feel are harmless actually are not.

you have no ability ...
you have no ability to comprehend anything past your own thoughts. You keep using the same? goddamn exapmlpe and i just f**king said that there are EXCEPTIONS. Holy s**t you are a dumbass!

Marriage is not ...
Marriage is not about religion. My husband? and I aren't religious and we had a nonreligious ceremony.

I believe that they ...
I believe that they should have some level of partnership, but I? don't think the government should be able to go into a church and say "Hey you have to make these two people of the same sex married even though it is against your religious beliefs". But Gays should still be able to share certain things that require you to be married to share. :D

I believe it? is a ...
I believe it? is a right. Its like saying two white people cant get married. When you look at it like this it looks stupid. The world is full of stupid people.

I agree the most ...
I agree the most important thing to do? in a discussion is to remain civil. with that said, how is gay marriage bad?

Is it not against ...
Is it not against human rights to say homosexuals shouldn't be able to marry? if so, would it? then be ok to call it a stupid belief? you may think believing that cows are sacred is harmless but as history demonstrates, it, like all stupid, unsupported beliefs, can be lethal. cows are sacred= harmless cows are sacred+ some people eating them= holy war/genocide god answers all prayers=harmless god answers all prayers+ kid sick= kid dying from lack of medical attention. stupid beliefs are lethal

I have. The Bible ...
I have. The Bible condones slavery. His people just dont like when its done to them.?

ya, and they were ...
ya, and they were slaves as well in? the old testaments. Mosses didn't just get up and leave Egypt because they were being treated correctly... Read Exodus... and the rest of the bible.

there are ...
there are exceptions to every rule. my point was that just because someone thinks differently, you do not have to call them an idiot. If what they think goes against, for example laws? or human rights, then yeah its not okay. But if someone, for example thinks cows are sacred, then you dont go around calling them retards.

There is a long ...
There is a long discussion we can have? about why gay marriage is bad. I'm not a homophobe, I have no problem with two men having sex or living with each other. I have no problem with two men adopting kids or starting a family. It is only the marriage of two men I disagree with. Although to have that kind of conversation a mature/non-abusive attitude towards each other would need to be taken.

So we know you're ...
So we know you're an idiot barely able to form a sentence, let alone a coherent thought. And that then doubly explains why you not only think that an amendment to a Constitution which is a part of it Constitution can be unconstitutional. It also explains why you think a Federal bench can rule on things that it is EXPLICITLY barred from ruling on. It would be bad enough if you were just arguing against the text of the Constitution, which? you are. But you're arguing against the dictionary.

you know, like how ...
you know, like how you need a license to do things like, and here's another example, GET MARRIED, to the States. So as we can see, you keep calling me stupid, but you clearly suffer from profound retardation. Everything you said was incredibly wrong. Marriage regulation is specifically and explicitly delegated to the States, not once, but several times, by that exact? same Constitution you accused me of not reading. You are really, really stupid. Thank you for proving that point.

respectively, or to ...
respectively, or to the people." then one would have to assume that that specific Constitution denied the Federal Government power over certain things like, oh, I don't know, marriage for another example. See, if the Constitution did not mention marriage a single time, not even once, then that text I posted would clearly indicate that a Federal court has EXACTLY ZERO say as to marriage law. And that case would be strengthened if,? say, that same Constitution granted the power to license (cont.)

Haha. I love that ...
Haha. I love that you keep calling me stupid, and in the same metaphorical breath typing things that prove you to be INCREDIBLY stupid. "THAT IS HOW A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC WORKS." See, how a constitutional republic actually works is that the State is bound to adhere to what its Constitution dictates. For example, if a Constitution were to? say, oh: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States (cont.)

I don't hate ...
I don't hate Mormons for what they believe. I hate them? for being repressive a*****es and trying to force their beliefs on others.

An amendment to a ...
An amendment to a state's constitution does not overrule the federal constitution, you dumb prick. They are two separate entities in a hierarchy. The states maintain a certain amount of sovereignty but the United States Constitution can't be contradicted by? the states. THAT IS HOW A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC WORKS.

immoral? says who? ...
immoral? says who? and? why specifically the pacific islands? lol

Slavery was also ...
Slavery was also once? a christian act.




Privacy Policy | Copyright/Trademark Notification